# Joseph Eli Bearden v. State of Florida

> Supreme Court of Florida · April 16, 2015 · 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 208

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9806907

## Case

- **Full name:** Joseph Eli BEARDEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** April 16, 2015
- **Citations:** 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 208; 161 So. 3d 1257; 2015 Fla. LEXIS 800; 2015 WL 1724590
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Canady
- **Judges:** Labarga, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Perry, Canady
- **Cited by:** 15 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9806907

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- observing that a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, but its interpretation of “the evidence code and applicable case law” is reviewed de novo (quoting Pantoja v. State, 59 So. 3d 1092, 1095 (Fla. 2011))

## Opinion text

CANADY, J.,
concurring in result.
I concur in the majority opinion except for the portions of the opinion relating to the prohibition of the recalling of Ray Allen Brown. I would not address that issue.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9806907. Public record. Not legal advice.