# Halliburton Co. v. Administrative Review Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · March 11, 2015 · 596 F. App'x 340

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9806375

## Case

- **Full name:** HALLIBURTON COMPANY, Petitioner, v. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, United States Department of Labor, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 11, 2015
- **Citations:** 596 F. App'x 340
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Dennis
- **Judges:** Jolly, Stewart, Dennis, Gilstrap
- **Nature of suit:** Agency
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9806375

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- applying the Burlington standard to a statutory retaliation claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

## Opinion text

JAMES L. DENNIS, District Judge.
ORDER:
A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), rehearing en banc is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, seven judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Davis, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod), and eight judges voted against (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, and Costa).
ENTERED FOR THE COURT:
James L. Dennis United States Circuit Judge

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9806375. Public record. Not legal advice.