# Pickle v. State

> Court of Appeals of Arkansas · December 17, 2014 · 453 S.W.3d 157

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9805266

## Case

- **Full name:** Jimmy Paul PICKLE, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arkansas
- **Decided:** December 17, 2014
- **Citations:** 453 S.W.3d 157; 2014 Ark. App. 726; 2014 Ark. LEXIS 659; 2014 Ark. App. LEXIS 1100
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Brown
- **Judges:** Larry D. Vaught
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9805266

## Opinion text

Waymond M. Brown, Judge, concurring.
hi agree with the majority that this case should be reversed and remanded. I write separately to express my belief that game wardens may perform hunting-and-safety compliance checks without reasonable suspicion or explicit, neutral limitations. However, I believe that after a compliance check has been completed, any additional encounter must be based upon an explicit, neutral limitation as required by State v. Allen, 1 in order to prevent game wardens from relying on their own unbridled discretion. Therefore, I concur.
Gruber, J., joins in this concurrence.
. 2013 Ark. 35 , 425 S.W.3d 753 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9805266. Public record. Not legal advice.