# Smith v. Daniel

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · December 11, 2014 · 452 S.W.3d 575

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9805143

## Case

- **Full name:** Charles SMITH, Betty Mains, James Scoggins, Bryan Hall, Each Individually and in Their Official Capacity, as Employees of the Department of Human Services, Department of Behavioral Sciences Serving the Arkansas State Hospital, Appellants v. Gloria DANIEL, Appellee
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** December 11, 2014
- **Citations:** 452 S.W.3d 575; 39 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 861; 2014 Ark. 519; 2014 Ark. LEXIS 655
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Corbin
- **Judges:** Josephine Linker Hart
- **Cited by:** 13 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9805143

## Opinion text

Donald L. Corbin, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur with the majority’s disposition of the claim under the Arkansas Whistle-blower Act, but I respectfully dissent as to the remaining points on appeal. Appellants chose to bring forth an abbreviated record of the circuit court proceedings, and I simply cannot ascertain from that record whether Appellants’ remaining arguments have merit.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9805143. Public record. Not legal advice.