# Bohannon v. Robinson

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · November 6, 2014 · 447 S.W.3d 585

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9804591

## Case

- **Full name:** Krystal BOHANNON, Appellant v. Edward ROBINSON, Appellee
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** November 6, 2014
- **Citations:** 447 S.W.3d 585; 2014 Ark. 458; 2014 Ark. LEXIS 596
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Goodson
- **Judges:** Jim Hannah
- **Cited by:** 36 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9804591

## Opinion text

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Justice, concurring.
I agree with the majority that Bohan-non’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is properly before this court because such an argument does not have to be presented at trial in order to be considered on appeal. However, I write separately because I cannot agree with the majority’s statement that we erred in Wills by failing to address Wills’ argument that the order of protection was erroneous and unsupported by the record. Though the majority assumes that Wills raised the sufficiency of the evidence in this point on appeal, the opinion in Wills does not reveal the substance of the argument that Wills made to this court. Therefore, I cannot agree with the majority’s assumption that the opinion in Wills contains an error.
BAKER, J., joins.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9804591. Public record. Not legal advice.