# State ex rel. Husted v. Brunner

> Ohio Supreme Court · October 6, 2009 · 123 Ohio St. 3d 288

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9802052

## Case

- **Full name:** The State Ex Rel. Husted v. Brunner Et Al.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 6, 2009
- **Citations:** 123 Ohio St. 3d 288; 915 N.E.2d 1215; 2009 Ohio 5327
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Pfeifer
- **Judges:** Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Moyer, Lanzinger, Pfeifer
- **Cited by:** 82 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9802052

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that the candidate still had a home in Kettering, which is where he intended to return

## Opinion text

Pfeifer, J.,
concurring in judgment only.
{¶ 36} For each Ohio citizen, where he or she deems to be home is a highly personal matter. Home is often different from where one is presently living. R.C. 3503.02 attempts to recognize that elusive, emotional connection to “home.” But this particular case is not difficult: considering that R.C. 3503.02 allows voters to retain a residence by relying on a vague notion of intent to return, it must certainly allow all members of the General Assembly to retain their residences in the places they regard to be home while living with their families in the state capital.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9802052. Public record. Not legal advice.