# State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow

> Ohio Supreme Court · April 29, 2010 · 125 Ohio St. 3d 407

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801944

## Case

- **Full name:** The State Ex Rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow, Dir., Et Al.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 29, 2010
- **Citations:** 125 Ohio St. 3d 407; 2010 Ohio 1844
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Pfeifer
- **Judges:** Cupp, Lundberg, Moyer, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Pfeifer, Stratton, Thomas
- **Cited by:** 78 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801944

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding relator not entitled to relief in mandamus where the requested relief was not sought in the complaint and the relator “did not timely amend its complaint to include a request for it”

## Opinion text

Pfeifer, Acting C.J., and Lanzinger, J.,
dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Pfeifer, J., in State ex rel. Associated Builders & Contrs. of Cent. Ohio v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 125 Ohio St.3d 112 , 2010-Ohio-1199 , 926 N.E.2d 600 .
The late Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer did not participate in the decision in this case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801944. Public record. Not legal advice.