# State v. Wilson

> Ohio Supreme Court · June 8, 2011 · 129 Ohio St. 3d 214

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801766

## Case

- **Full name:** The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Wilson, Appellee
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 8, 2011
- **Citations:** 129 Ohio St. 3d 214; 2011 Ohio 2669
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Pfeifer
- **Judges:** Brown, O'Connor, Stratton, O'Donnell, Cupp, Lanzinger, Pfeifer
- **Cited by:** 355 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801766

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that “the proper remedy for an allied-offenses sentencing error” is to “‘reverse the judgment of conviction and remand for a new sentencing hearing’”

## Opinion text

Pfeifer, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
{¶ 38} I concur in the judgment of the majority and in the bulk of the majority opinion. I dissent, however, from any portion of the majority opinion that relies on or contains an approving reference to State v. Saxon, 109 Ohio St.3d 176 , 2006-Ohio-1245 , 846 N.E.2d 824 , for the reasons stated in my dissent in Saxon.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801766. Public record. Not legal advice.