# State Ex Rel. Coble v. Lucas County Board of Elections

> Ohio Supreme Court · September 9, 2011 · 130 Ohio St. 3d 132

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801714

## Case

- **Full name:** The State Ex Rel. Coble v. Lucas County Board of Elections Et Al.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 9, 2011
- **Citations:** 130 Ohio St. 3d 132; 2011 Ohio 4550
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Pfeifer
- **Judges:** O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Brown, Pfeifer, Stratton, Lanzinger
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801714

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- concluding that a paragraph from an earlier decision "was unnecessary to the court's holding and was thus dicta"
- concluding that paragraph from an earlier decision was "unnecessary to the court's holding and was thus dicta"

## Opinion text

Pfeifer, J.,
concurring.
{¶ 35} I concur in judgment. However, I believe this court should simply overrule State ex rel. Canales-Flores v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections, 108 Ohio St.3d 129 , 2005-Ohio-5642 , 841 N.E.2d 757 . Its holding was as wrong as its dicta.
Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801714. Public record. Not legal advice.