# Pauley v. City of Circleville

> Ohio Supreme Court · October 16, 2013 · 137 Ohio St. 3d 212

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801439

## Case

- **Full name:** Pauley Et Al., Appellants, v. the City of Circleville, Appellee, Et Al.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 16, 2013
- **Citations:** 137 Ohio St. 3d 212; 998 N.E.2d 1083; 2013 Ohio 4541
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Pfeifer
- **Judges:** Kennedy, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, French, Pfeifer, O'Neill
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801439

## Opinion text

Pfeifer, J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 40} I join Justice O’Neill’s dissent, although I do not share his enthusiasm for the recreational-user statutes. In particular, the immunity provisions contained in R.C. 1533.18 and 1533.181 are overbroad and provide unreasonable and, with respect to governmental entities, unconstitutional protection to premises owners.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801439. Public record. Not legal advice.