# Disciplinary Counsel v. Agopian

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 27, 2006 · 112 Ohio St. 3d 103

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801191

## Case

- **Full name:** Disciplinary Counsel v. Agopian
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 27, 2006
- **Citations:** 112 Ohio St. 3d 103; 858 N.E.2d 368; 2006 Ohio 6510
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Lanzinger
- **Judges:** O'Donnell, Resnick, Pfeifer, Stratton, Moyer, O'Connor, Lanzinger
- **Cited by:** 51 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801191

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that mitigating evidence demonstrating that Agopian had no prior disciplinary record, had fully cooperated with the disciplinary process, had accepted responsibility for his conduct, and had provided over 40 character references counseled against impos *213 ing a great…

## Opinion text

Lanzinger, J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 16} I respectfully dissent. I would impose a one-year stayed suspension as recommended by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.
Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., concur in the foregoing opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9801191. Public record. Not legal advice.