# Salazar v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · December 7, 2005 · 126 P.3d 625

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9798023

## Case

- **Full name:** Maximo Lee SALAZAR, Appellant v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** December 7, 2005
- **Citations:** 126 P.3d 625; 2005 OK CR 24; 2005 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21; 2005 WL 3303870
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Lewis
- **Judges:** Chapel, Johnson, Lewis, Lumpkin
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9798023

## Opinion text

LEWIS, Judge,
concurs in part/dissents in part:
¶ 11 concur in reversing the verdict in this ease. However, I dissent to modifying the sentence. I would reverse and remand for a new trial on the issue of mental retardation.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9798023. Public record. Not legal advice.