# Scott v. Peterson

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · November 22, 2005 · 126 P.3d 1232

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9798000

## Case

- **Full name:** Martin SCOTT and Cynthia Scott, Petitioners, v. the Honorable David L. PETERSON, Judge of the District Court of Tulsa County, Fourteenth Judicial District, State of Oklahoma, Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** November 22, 2005
- **Citations:** 126 P.3d 1232; 2005 OK 84; 2005 Okla. LEXIS 94; 2005 WL 3112022
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Taylor
- **Judges:** Edmondson, Taylor, Watt, Winchester, Lavender, Hargrave, Opala, Kauger, Colbert
- **Cited by:** 33 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9798000

## Opinion text

¶ 30 TAYLOR, J.,
Dissents.
I would deny original jurisdiction. The trial judge was correct in the first instance and should be affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9798000. Public record. Not legal advice.