# Easlick v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 3, 2004 · 75 O.B.A.J. 1292

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9797080

## Case

- **Full name:** Rodney Eugene EASLICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** May 3, 2004
- **Citations:** 75 O.B.A.J. 1292; 90 P.3d 556; 2004 OK CR 21; 2004 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25; 2004 WL 955258
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Strubhar
- **Judges:** Lile, Johnson, Lumpkin, Chapel, Strubhar
- **Cited by:** 61 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9797080

## Opinion text

STRUBHAR, J.,
Dissenting.
¶ 1 I dissent. There is no reason for this Court to adopt a new procedure on the questions presented to us on sufficiency of the' evidence. The different standards of review now utilized are indeed justified.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9797080. Public record. Not legal advice.