# Reeds v. Walker

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · June 20, 2006 · 157 P.3d 100

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9796725

## Case

- **Full name:** William S. REEDS, Co-Guardian of the Estate of Phillip M. Reeds, and Ellen O. Reeds, Co-Guardian of the Estate of Phillip M. Reeds, and Phillip M. Reeds, Petitioners, v. the Honorable Thomas S. WALKER, Judge of the District Court, Carter County, Oklahoma, Respondent; National American Insurance Company, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. William S. Reeds, Co-Guardian of the Estate of Phillip M. Reeds, and Ellen O. Reeds, Co-Guardian of the Estate of Phillip M. Reeds, and Phillip M. Reeds, Defendants/Appellants
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** June 20, 2006
- **Citations:** 157 P.3d 100; 2006 OK 43; 2006 Okla. LEXIS 41; 2006 WL 1686739
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Taylor
- **Judges:** Watt, Lavender, Hargrave, Opala, Kauger, Edmondson, Colbert, Winchester, Taylor
- **Cited by:** 114 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9796725

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- applying this standard to review of motions denying a new trial after summary judgment was granted

## Opinion text

T 39 TAYLOR, J.,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent for the reason that the language, meaning and intent of the reimbursement terms of this insurance contract are clear and unambiguous. The trial court was correct in its decision.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9796725. Public record. Not legal advice.