# Angelucci v. Century Supper Club

> California Supreme Court · May 31, 2007 · 59 Cal. Rptr. 3d 142

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9795331

## Case

- **Full name:** MARC ANGELUCCI Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CENTURY SUPPER CLUB, Defendant and Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 31, 2007
- **Citations:** 59 Cal. Rptr. 3d 142; 41 Cal. 4th 160; 158 P.3d 718; 2007 Cal. LEXIS 5489
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Werdegar
- **Judges:** George, Werdegar
- **Cited by:** 149 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9795331

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- discussing race-discrimination cases and explaining that plaintiffs suffered injury when they “were admitted to a movie theater or racetrack clubhouse or gained access to a soda fountain, but, because of their race, were restricted to a segregated or otherwise substandard area”
- explaining plaintiffs had standing because they “adequately alleged they had suffered an ‘invasion of legally protected interests’ sufficient to afford them an interest in pursuing their action vigorously” (citation omitted)

## Opinion text

WERDEGAR, J., Concurring.
I fully agree with the majority’s analysis and conclusion. I write separately because I cannot join the majority’s *181 conjectural discussion (ante, at p. 179) of equitable defenses to hypothetical claims under the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 52, subd. (a)). As the majority explains (ante, at p. 180), no such issue is before us. That nothing the majority says on the subject has any precedential force necessarily follows. (People v. Mendoza (2000) 23 Cal.4th 896, 915 [ 98 Cal.Rptr.2d 431 , 4 P.3d 265 ]; Hart v. Burnett (1860) 15 Cal. 530, 598-599 .)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9795331. Public record. Not legal advice.