# State v. Pinnell

> Oregon Supreme Court · August 4, 1994 · 319 Or. 438

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9792761

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK ALLEN PINNELL, Appellant
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 4, 1994
- **Citations:** 319 Or. 438; 877 P.2d 635; 1994 Ore. LEXIS 70
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Durham
- **Judges:** Graber, Fadeley, Durham
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9792761

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating the quoted Oregon standard for harmless error (internal quotation marks omitted)
- stating Oregon's harmless error standard

## Opinion text

DURHAM, J.,
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion in State v. Wagner, 309 Or 5, 20 , 786 P2d 93 (Linde, J., dissenting), cert den 498 US 879 (1990) [Wagner II], I dissent from the majority’s disposition of defendant’s second assignment of error, in which he argues that the trial court erred in *450 overruling his demurrers to the indictment. This court should reconsider its holding in Wagner II and determine whether defendant is entitled to the relief he seeks in that assignment.
Fadeley, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9792761. Public record. Not legal advice.