# Arthur v. Arthur

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · August 2, 1960 · 354 P.2d 199

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9792073

## Case

- **Full name:** Charles S. ARTHUR and Anna Pearson Arthur, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Ira W. ARTHUR, Administrator With the Will Annexed, and Lizzie Kaler, Executrix of the Estate of J. E. Shirk, Deceased; Virgil M. Shaw, Executor of the Estate of Cassie Vance, Deceased, Defendants in Error
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** August 2, 1960
- **Citations:** 354 P.2d 199
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Halley
- **Judges:** Davison, Williams, Halley, Johnson, Jackson, Irwin, Welch, Blackbird
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9792073

## Opinion text

HALLEY, Justice
(dissenting).
■ I dissent in this case because I think that the majority opinion misconstrues the effect of the dismissals filed in this Court. There was nothing in those dismissals which in 'any way affected the right of Charles S. Arthur to prosecute his appeal in this case. It was not the intention of this Court to in any way curtail his rights on the appeal.
Without going into too great detail I am of the opinion that the majority has reached a very inequitable result in its decision. I dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9792073. Public record. Not legal advice.