# Viner v. Untrecht

> California Supreme Court · April 17, 1945 · 26 Cal. 2d 261

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9791500

## Case

- **Full name:** BETTY RUTH L. VINER Et Al., Respondents, v. MARY UNTRECHT, Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 17, 1945
- **Citations:** 26 Cal. 2d 261; 158 P.2d 3; 1945 Cal. LEXIS 152
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Traynor
- **Judges:** Carter, Traynor
- **Cited by:** 107 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9791500

## Opinion text

TRAYNOR, J.
I concur. My views with respect to the scope of appellate review in cases where “clear and convincing evidence” is required are set forth in my dissenting opinions in Stromerson v. Averill, 22 Cal.2d 808, 817 [ 141 P.2d 732 ], and Beeler v. American Trust Co., 24 Cal.2d 1, 29 [ 147 P.2d 583 ], These views remain unchanged, but the rule announced in those cases now governs the scope of appellate review in this state.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9791500. Public record. Not legal advice.