# State v. Lammie

> Court of Appeals of Arizona · March 29, 1990 · 164 Ariz. 377

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9791251

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Michael Patrick LAMMIE, Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arizona
- **Decided:** March 29, 1990
- **Citations:** 164 Ariz. 377; 57 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 58; 793 P.2d 134; 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 121
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Ehrlich
- **Judges:** Shelley, Ehrlich, Contreras
- **Cited by:** 25 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9791251

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding sex offender registration provision applied to persons convicted of attempted as well as completed sexual offenses even though provision made no reference to attempted offenses

## Opinion text

EHRLICH, Judge,
concurring.
I concur in the result. I believe that the majority unnecessarily reached the issue of constitutionality of sex offender registrar tion given that the defendant did not question “the legislative power to oblige sex registration” and given the discussion of the issue of attempt.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9791251. Public record. Not legal advice.