# Hartsfield v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · July 16, 1986 · 722 P.2d 717

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9789445

## Case

- **Full name:** Daniel Ray HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** July 16, 1986
- **Citations:** 722 P.2d 717; 1986 OK CR 115; 1986 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 307
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Parks
- **Judges:** Bussey, Brett, Parks
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9789445

## Opinion text

PARKS, Presiding Judge,
dissenting:
I would reverse the conviction herein on the basis of this Court’s decision in Dun-gan v. State, 651 P.2d 1064 (Okl.Cr.1982), in which we held that the State is absolutely prohibited from mentioning an accused’s exercise of fundamental constitutional rights.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9789445. Public record. Not legal advice.