# County of San Diego v. Ace Property & Casualty Insurance

> California Supreme Court · August 29, 2005 · 33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 583

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9788513

## Case

- **Full name:** COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Cross-Complainant and Appellant, v. ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY Et al.L Cross-Defendants and Respondents
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 29, 2005
- **Citations:** 33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 583; 37 Cal. 4th 406; 2005 Daily Journal DAR 10554; 118 P.3d 607; 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7798; 2005 Cal. LEXIS 9548
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Werdegar
- **Judges:** Baxter, Werdegar, Moreno, Kennard
- **Cited by:** 73 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9788513

## Opinion text

WERDEGAR, J., Concurring.
I concur in the judgment under the compulsion of Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. Superior Court (2001) 24 Cal.4th 945 [ 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 672 , 16 P.3d 94 ] and Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 857 [ 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 107 , 959 P.2d 265 ], decisions from which I dissented and which in my view deserve reconsideration.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9788513. Public record. Not legal advice.