# Grisby v. Progressive Preferred Insurance

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · September 6, 2006 · 207 Or. App. 592

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9788357

## Case

- **Full name:** Omar J. GRISBY, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** September 6, 2006
- **Citations:** 207 Or. App. 592; 142 P.3d 531; 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1347
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Landau
- **Judges:** Landau, Schuman, Ortega
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9788357

## Opinion text

LANDAU, P. J.,
concurring.
Were we writing on a clean slate, I might arrive at a different result than the one that the majority reaches. I am not persuaded that its construction of the terms “coverage” and “amount of benefits” comports with their ordinary meanings or the meanings reflected in related statutes. I am persuaded, however, that the majority is correct in relying on Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 326 Or 294, 300 , 952 P2d 1012 (1998). For that reason, I concur in the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9788357. Public record. Not legal advice.