# Dale v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · January 2, 2002 · 73 O.B.A.J. 13

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786743

## Case

- **Full name:** Kenneth Earl DALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** January 2, 2002
- **Citations:** 73 O.B.A.J. 13; 38 P.3d 910; 2002 OK CR 1; 2002 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 1; 2002 WL 4645
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Lile
- **Judges:** Johnson, Viece-Presgiding, Lile, Chapel, Strubhar, Lumpkin
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786743

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the defendant's consent to search his premises was involuntary considering the totality of the circumstances, including an unlawful entry onto his property by climbing over a locked gate, the number of agents participating, the fact that they were armed with both …

## Opinion text

LILE, J.;
SPECIALLY CONCURS.
11 I agree that the "consent" to search was not voluntary under the facts in this case, and the results of the search must be suppressed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786743. Public record. Not legal advice.