# Jones v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · March 14, 2006 · 128 P.3d 521

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786327

## Case

- **Full name:** Julius Darius JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** March 14, 2006
- **Citations:** 128 P.3d 521; 2006 OK CR 5; 2006 WL 197883
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Lumpkin
- **Judges:** Johnson, Viee-Presiding, Chapel, Taylor, Lumpkin
- **Cited by:** 53 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786327

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding that tactical team's entry to secure residence, to serve an arrest warrant, and to arrest defendant, so that the search could proceed safely several hours later, was "the initial execution of the search warrant ..." and holding that "service of the search warrant begin…
- holding that service of a warrant occurs "once an officer crosses the threshold for the purpose of beginning the search or for securing the residence for a later search"
- holding that the flight instruction was appropriate

## Opinion text

LUMPKIN, Viee-Presiding Judge:
Concurring in Results.
T1 I concur in the Court's decision and analysis in affirming the judgments and sentences in this case. However, in Proposition Eighteen, I would find Appellant has waived review of his claim as he has failed to cite any legal authority supporting his argument for this Court's reconsideration of previously adjudicated legal issues. See Rule 3.5(C), Rules of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Title 22, Ch.18, App. (2006).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786327. Public record. Not legal advice.