# Lockett v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · August 14, 2002 · 73 O.B.A.J. 2327

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786159

## Case

- **Full name:** Clayton Derrell LOCKETT, Appellant. v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** August 14, 2002
- **Citations:** 73 O.B.A.J. 2327; 53 P.3d 418; 2002 OK CR 30; 2002 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35; 2002 WL 1856689
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Chapel
- **Judges:** Strubhar, Lumpkin, Chapel, Johnson, Lile
- **Cited by:** 57 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786159

## Opinion text

CHAPEL, Judge,
Concurs in Results.
1 1 I concur in the majority opinion except for those portions which resolve Proposition IX concerning the use of unadjudicated offenses to support the continuing threat ag-gravator and Proposition IV concerning the Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 1866 , claim. I would invalidate the continuing threat aggravator found in this case. However, I would affirm the sentence of death, as there was sufficient evidence to support the other aggravators.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9786159. Public record. Not legal advice.