# Gunderson v. F.A. Richard & Associates

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · August 25, 2010 · 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 01498

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783332

## Case

- **Full name:** Dr. Clark GUNDERSON, Et Al. v. F.A. RICHARD & ASSOCIATES, Et Al.
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** August 25, 2010
- **Citations:** 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 01498; 44 So. 3d 779; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 1199; 2010 WL 2594287
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by Cooks
- **Judges:** Cooks, Ezell, Painter
- **Cited by:** 22 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783332

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that companies that act as middlemen do not provide health benefits and are therefore not exempt under La. R.S. 40:2203.1(A)

## Opinion text

COOKS, J.,
on rehearing.
hi have examined the record again. After re-checking the record there is nothing in it suggesting that the Order of Appeal *792 was signed before the Summary Judgment was signed by the trial court. Defendant’s brief acknowledges in footnote 10 that there is no way to determine from this record the order in which the trial court signed the Order of Appeal and the Summary Judgment. See also La. C.C.P. art 2088(A)(7).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783332. Public record. Not legal advice.