# Vega v. State Farm Mutual Automobile

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · August 20, 2010 · 45 So. 3d 43

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783281

## Case

- **Full name:** Ricardo VEGA, Individually, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE, Etc., Appellee
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** August 20, 2010
- **Citations:** 45 So. 3d 43; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12375; 2010 WL 3269227
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Torpy
- **Judges:** Palmer, Torpy, Cohen
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783281

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that facts or data used to support the opinion expressed “need not be admissible in evidence if they are of the type reasonably relied upon by experts in the subject”

## Opinion text

TORPY, J.,
concurring.
I fully concur with the majority opinion. I write to point out that, though not argued here or below, a fact issue was clearly presented through the deposition of Appellant, who gave his own opinion of value as the owner of the property.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783281. Public record. Not legal advice.