# Ex Parte Worley

> Supreme Court of Alabama · December 30, 2009 · 46 So. 3d 916

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783138

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex Parte Nancy WORLEY, Individually, and Beth Chapman, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of State. (In Re Anita Tatum v. Nancy Worley, in Her Individual Capacity, and Beth Chapman, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of State and in Her Individual Capacity)
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** December 30, 2009
- **Citations:** 46 So. 3d 916; 2009 Ala. LEXIS 299; 2009 WL 5173505
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Woodall
- **Judges:** Parker, Lyons, Stuart, Smith, Cobb, Woodall, Shaw
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783138

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- discussing the application of § 14 immunity, and the relevance of § 112, to the Secretary of State

## Opinion text

WOODALL, Justice
(concurring in the result).
I concur in the result. All of Tatum’s claims are clearly barred by the immunity afforded Worley and Chapman by § 14, Ala. Const.1901.
COBB, C.J., concurs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783138. Public record. Not legal advice.