# Capitol House Preservation Co. v. Perryman Consultants, Inc.

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · August 28, 2009 · 2008 La.App. 1 Cir. 0367

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783128

## Case

- **Full name:** CAPITOL HOUSE PRESERVATION COMPANY, L.L.C. v. PERRYMAN CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED; Mr. M. Ray Perryman, XYZ Insurance Company and TUV Insurance Company
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** August 28, 2009
- **Citations:** 2008 La.App. 1 Cir. 0367; 47 So. 3d 408; 2009 La. App. LEXIS 1551; 2009 WL 2900764
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Pettigrew
- **Judges:** Parro, Pettigrew, Welch
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783128

## Opinion text

PETTIGREW, J.,
concurring.
|,I have concerns about reversing a judgment reflecting a verdict of the jury. I am further of the opinion that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine should not be interpreted broadly and should only apply in the context of Sherman antitrust litigation.. However, I do note the recent case cited by the majority of Astoria Entm’t, Inc. v. Debartolo, 08-1690 (La.5/22/09), 12 So.3d 956 , decided by the Louisiana Supreme Court; and I am constrained to follow same.
For these reasons and, considering the unique facts of this case, I will concur with the majority.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9783128. Public record. Not legal advice.