# People v. Johnson

> California Supreme Court · May 3, 2004 · 1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9781771

## Case

- **Full name:** The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAY SHAWN JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 3, 2004
- **Citations:** 1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1; 30 Cal. 4th 1302; 71 P.3d 270
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Werdegar
- **Judges:** Chin, Werdegar, Kennard
- **Cited by:** 72 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed by Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162 (2005).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9781771

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that the court maintains its “longstanding practice” of refusing to engage in comparative juror analysis for the first time on appeal

## Opinion text

WERDEGAR, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in parts I., II.A. and II.C. of the majority opinion. With respect to the proper standard of proof for establishing a prima facie showing under People v. Wheeler (1978) *1329 22 Cal.3d 258 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 890 , 583 P.2d 748 ] and Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 [ 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 ], I dissent and join part II. of Justice Kennard’s dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9781771. Public record. Not legal advice.