# Blonner v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · January 5, 2006 · 127 P.3d 1135

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9781647

## Case

- **Full name:** Ricardo Virgo BLONNER, Appellant v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** January 5, 2006
- **Citations:** 127 P.3d 1135; 2006 OK CR 1
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Lewis
- **Judges:** Chapel, Johnson, Lumpkin, Lewis
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9781647

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that if the pretrial hearing results in a finding of no intellectual disability, “[t]he issue of mental retardation shall not be relitigated at the capital first degree murder trial”
- discussing procedure for resolving Atkins defense

## Opinion text

LEWIS, Judge,
Specially concurs.
¶ 1 I concur with the result; however the state should not lose its option of seeking the bill of particulars if the jury cannot agree on a verdict in the mental retardation trial. I would require that another jury be impaneled on this issue.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9781647. Public record. Not legal advice.