# Clay County Board of County Commissioners/Scibal Associates v. Bramlitt

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 23, 2011 · 61 So. 3d 1239

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780559

## Case

- **Full name:** CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/SCIBAL ASSOCIATES, Appellants, v. Richard A. BRAMLITT, Appellee
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** May 23, 2011
- **Citations:** 61 So. 3d 1239; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8416; 2011 WL 1938235
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Benton, Padovano, Wetherell
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780559

## Opinion text

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.'
We deny the Employer/Carrier’s motion for rehearing, but on our own motion, we withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.
The Employer/Carrier (E/C) raises two issues in this workers’ compensation appeal, contending the Judge of Compensation Claims erred (1) in concluding that Claimant’s hypertension is compensable, and (2) in ordering the E/C to reimburse Claimant for out-of-pocket medical expenses. We affirm as to the first issue without further comment.
We reverse as to the second issue because Claimant did not file a petition for benefits seeking reimbursement for out-of-pocket medical expenses, and the Judge of Compensation Claims’ finding that the E/C stipulated to determination of the issue is not supported by competent substantial evidence. Due process bars a ruling on matters not at issue because the parties are entitled to notice in order to fairly present their case. See Specialty Risk Servs. v. Fleming, 875 So.2d 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Commercial Carrier Corp. v. LaPointe, 723 So.2d 912, 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Lakeside Baptist Church v. Jones, 714 So.2d 1188, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
BENTON, C.J., and PADOVANO, J., concur; WETHERELL, J., concurs specially with opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780559. Public record. Not legal advice.