# Dowdy v. City of Monroe

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · November 2, 2011 · 78 So. 3d 791

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780245

## Case

- **Full name:** Jewel DOWDY and Jesse Dowdy, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF MONROE and Monroe Civic Center, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** November 2, 2011
- **Citations:** 78 So. 3d 791; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1282; 2011 WL 5170429
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Drew
- **Judges:** Gaskins, Caraway, Drew
- **Cited by:** 25 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780245

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that “[t]he court is charged legislatively by this favored procedure to determine the legal significance of the undisputed facts”

## Opinion text

DREW, J.,
dissenting.
_JjAs this appears to me to be a comparative liability case, I must respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780245. Public record. Not legal advice.