# State v. GT, JR.

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · June 15, 2011 · 71 So. 3d 394

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780167

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Louisiana v. G.T., JR.
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** June 15, 2011
- **Citations:** 71 So. 3d 394; 2011 WL 2327260
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Thibodeaux
- **Judges:** Thibodeaux, Peters, Gremillion
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780167

## Opinion text

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge,
concurring for additional reasons.
| ,1 write a separate concurrence to express the abandonment of my previous reliance on State v. R.W.W., 06-1253 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/7/07) , 953 So.2d 131 , which conditionally affirms a defendant’s conviction and sentence, but remands the case to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the voluntariness of a plea. I now rely on the procedure utilized in this case based on State v. Clark, 97-1064 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/1/98) , 711 So.2d 738 and State v. Fuslier, 06-1438 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/4/07) , 954 So.2d 866 . State v. Clark and State v. Fustier mandate a remand to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the voluntariness of a plea without conditionally affirming the defendant’s conviction and sentence.
For the foregoing reasons, I additionally concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9780167. Public record. Not legal advice.