# Hurt v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1972 · 480 S.W.2d 747

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9776395

## Case

- **Full name:** Hubert HURT, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** May 31, 1972
- **Citations:** 480 S.W.2d 747; 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2204
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Morrison
- **Judges:** Roberts, Morrison, Douglas
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9776395

## Opinion text

MORRISON, Judge
(concurring).
I agree with the reversal of this conviction and shall state my reasons.
I believe the train got off the track when the State took the position that the expert witness, Dr. Bublis became a reputation or character witness when she took the stand in mitigation of punishment due to appellant’s mental problems. She was not qualified by appellant as either a character or reputation witness. See Brown v. State, supra, and Jones v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 479 S.W.2d 307 (1972). Therefore, she should not have been subjected to “have you heard” type questions which are reserved for character and reputation witnesses under Article 37.07, Sec. 3(a), V.A. C.C.P. This is the converse of the situation presented in Allaben v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 418 S.W.2d 517 . I believe the learned trial judge failed to pull the train back on the track by misinterpreting the reason Dr. Bublis was presented as a witness for the appellant.
I concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9776395. Public record. Not legal advice.