# Thomas v. Collins

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · October 30, 1997 · 960 S.W.2d 106

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9770723

## Case

- **Full name:** Dan THOMAS, Appellant, v. James A. COLLINS, Appellee
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** October 30, 1997
- **Citations:** 960 S.W.2d 106; 1997 WL 476308
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** O'Connor, Taft, Schneider, Cohen, Mirabal, Wilson, Hedges, Andell, Nuchia
- **Cited by:** 40 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9770723

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that expert’s conclusory statements regarding officer’s good faith were insufficient to support or defeat summary judgment
- holding that administrative segregation is not per se unconstitutional

## Opinion text

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
Dan Thomas, appellant, has filed a motion for rehearing en banc. After due consideration, we overrule the motion for rehearing en banc.
It is so Ordered.
SCHNEIDER, C.J., and COHEN, MIRABAL, O’CONNOR, WILSON, HEDGES, ANDELL, TAFT and NUCHIA, JJ., not participating.
O’CONNOR, J., dissenting.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9770723. Public record. Not legal advice.