# Ladner v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · October 25, 1989 · 780 S.W.2d 247

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9768825

## Case

- **Full name:** Thomas E. LADNER, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee; Billy Ray HORTON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee; James M. HYDEN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** October 25, 1989
- **Citations:** 780 S.W.2d 247; 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196; 1989 WL 125745
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Miller
- **Judges:** Miller, Duncan, Teague, Clinton
- **Cited by:** 48 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9768825

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that courts should not decide the proper application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel solely on the basis of the self-serving declarations and opinions of counsel
- discussing with approval court of appeal’s review of double jeopardy claim

## Opinion text

MILLER, J.,
concurs with note: “I concur in the result reached in disposing of appellant’s ‘preliminary claim’ (page 249). I would prefer a ‘same offense’ analysis more along the lines of January v. State, 695 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1985), approved by this Court in January v. State, 732 S.W.2d 632 (Tex.Cr.App.1987). I join the rest of the majority opinion.”
TEAGUE, J., dissents.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9768825. Public record. Not legal advice.