# Hamil v. Bashline

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · September 27, 1976 · 243 Pa. Super. 227

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9766335

## Case

- **Full name:** Martha S. HAMIL, Administratrix of the Estate of Kenneth C. Hamil, Appellant, v. H. Woodrow BASHLINE, Et Al.
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** September 27, 1976
- **Citations:** 243 Pa. Super. 227; 364 A.2d 1366; 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2832
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Spaeth
- **Judges:** Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Spaeth
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Vacated by Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256 (1978).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9766335

## Opinion text

SPAETH, Judge
(dissenting):
As I read their respective opinions, Judge Hoffman and Judge Cercone agree on the law of proximate cause. On this, I am with them both. I join Judge Cercone in dissent because I think the lower court’s charge was erroneous.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9766335. Public record. Not legal advice.