# Perkins v. Ingalsbe

> Texas Supreme Court · June 14, 1961 · 162 Tex. 456

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9764438

## Case

- **Full name:** Dallas G. Perkins v. Reed Ingalsbe
- **Court:** Texas Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 14, 1961
- **Citations:** 162 Tex. 456; 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 535; 347 S.W.2d 926; 1961 Tex. LEXIS 681
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Walker
- **Judges:** Griffin, Walker, Smith
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9764438

## Opinion text

MR. JUSTICE WALKER,
joined by CHIEF JUSTICE CALVERT, concurring.
As pointed out by the majority opinion, the County Judge could not properly have refused to order the election in the first instance, and therefore had no power to revoke his election order, on the ground that the proposed limits did not embrace all of the territory that should be included. Ewing v. State ex rel. Pollard, 81 Tex. 172 , 16 S.W. 872 . Once that conclusion is reached, it is unnecessary to say that an election order can never be revoked. I concur in the reversal and remand of the cause but wish to reserve the question considered in Cameron v. Baker, Tex. Civ. App., 13 S.W. 2d 119 (no writ), until it is squarely presented to ,us for decision.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9764438. Public record. Not legal advice.