# In Re Review of Opinion 475 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics & DR 2-102(C)

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · April 28, 1982 · 89 N.J. 74

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9762321

## Case

- **Full name:** On Petition for Review of Opinion 475 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics and Dr 2-102(c)
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** April 28, 1982
- **Citations:** 89 N.J. 74; 444 A.2d 1092; 33 A.L.R. 4th 381; 1982 N.J. LEXIS 1898
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Handler
- **Judges:** Handler
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9762321

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that “[o]ur traditional method of rule evaluation is by reference to Supreme Court Committee, report and recommendation by that committee, and finally, a decision by this Court”

## Opinion text

HANDLER, J.,
concurring in the result and dissenting in part.
For affirmance—Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices PASHMAN, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O’HERN—6.
For reversal —None.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9762321. Public record. Not legal advice.