# State v. Scott

> Supreme Court of Missouri · October 13, 1981 · 621 S.W.2d 915

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9761468

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy E. SCOTT, Appellant
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Missouri
- **Decided:** October 13, 1981
- **Citations:** 621 S.W.2d 915; 1981 Mo. LEXIS 411
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bardgett
- **Judges:** Houser, Morgan, Rendlen, Welborn, Bardgett
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9761468

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that a defendant was " 'heard' on his motion for new trial within the meaning and intent of Rule 29.07(b)(1)" where "the record shows that the motion was considered and acted upon, and that counsel for [the defendant] was present at the time and place and remained sile…
- holding that a defendant was " 'heard' on his motion for new trial within the meaning and intent of Rule 29.07(b)(1

## Opinion text

BARDGETT, Judge,
concurring.
With all due respect, I concur in overruling appellant’s point one because a hearing was afforded, majority op. 916, and in overruling point two because allocution was granted, majority op. 918, and in the disposition of point three and the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9761468. Public record. Not legal advice.