# Kinco, Inc. v. Schueck Steel, Inc.

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · June 25, 1984 · 283 Ark. 72

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759979

## Case

- **Full name:** Kinco, Inc. v. Schueck Steel, Inc.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** June 25, 1984
- **Citations:** 283 Ark. 72; 671 S.W.2d 178; 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1724
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Adkisson
- **Judges:** Dudley, Adkisson, Hays
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759979

## Opinion text

Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Justice, dissenting. It is undisputed that the architect was not authorized to create a business expectancy for Schueck by assuring Schueck that its product would be used. A business expectancy never existed. Schueck had only a hope that its product would be used. This hope was mostly based on the fact that the architect had given Schueck an advantage by using its product to write the specifications.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759979. Public record. Not legal advice.