# State v. Buck

> Tennessee Supreme Court · January 30, 1984 · 670 S.W.2d 600

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759855

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Joseph Glenn BUCK, Appellant
- **Court:** Tennessee Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 30, 1984
- **Citations:** 670 S.W.2d 600; 1984 Tenn. LEXIS 926
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Brock
- **Judges:** Fones, Cooper, Harbison, Drowota, Brock
- **Cited by:** 234 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759855

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that information in NCIC reports is pure hearsay of a dubious degree of accuracy, prepared for purposes other than court use, contains information that is likely to be prejudicial under all circumstances, and is not the best evidence of matters that can be proven by re…
- holding that the jury charge for the (i)(7) aggravating circumstance should have been limited to rape, robbery, and kidnapping

## Opinion text

BROCK, Justice,
concurring in part; dissenting in part.
I concur in the opinion of the Court in all respects except the constitutionality of the death penalty. With respect to the constitutionality of the death penalty, I adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in State v. Dicks, Tenn., 615 S.W.2d 126 (1981).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759855. Public record. Not legal advice.
