# Saenz v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · November 25, 1992 · 843 S.W.2d 24

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759604

## Case

- **Full name:** Horencio Fernandez SAENZ, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** November 25, 1992
- **Citations:** 843 S.W.2d 24; 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 215; 1992 WL 341553
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by McCORMICK
- **Judges:** Overstreet, Clinton, McCormick, Baird, Benavides, Campbell, White
- **Cited by:** 60 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759604

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding State=s insinuation defendant was involved in prior criminal acts was unfairly prejudicial

## Opinion text

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge,
concurring and dissenting.
I do not agree that the admission of the complained of evidence was error, but be *30 lieve the Court of Appeals was correct in its disposition. I, therefore, dissent to the finding of error.
However, for the reasons set forth in Part II of Judge Clinton’s concurring opinion, I concur in the remand to the Court of Appeals for assessment of harm, if any.
J. WHITE joins this concurring and dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9759604. Public record. Not legal advice.