# In Re Angelini

> Texas Supreme Court · February 24, 2006 · 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 376

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9758088

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re the Honorable Karen ANGELINI
- **Court:** Texas Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 24, 2006
- **Citations:** 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 376; 186 S.W.3d 558; 2006 Tex. LEXIS 138; 2006 WL 435830
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Johnson
- **Judges:** Brister, Jefferson, Hecht, Medina, Green, Johnson, O'Neill, Wainwright, Willett
- **Cited by:** 96 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9758088

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that an appellate court may not decide *453disputed fact issues in an original mandamus proceeding
- holding that mandamus relief is not available when there are factual disputes
- noting there was “ample time” for trial findings and appellate review and, where necessary, direct review by the supreme court

## Opinion text

Justice JOHNSON,
joined by Justice O’NEILL, concurring.
I agree that mandamus relief should be denied because factual disputes exist. Once that conclusion has been reached and expressed, however, no further controversy is before us as this matter is postured. I would not opine as to what relief is appropriate in the event of future hearings and if particular factual determinations result from those hearings.
Further, although I joined with Justice Wainwright in dissenting from the Court’s decisions in Francis and Holcomb and still believe that those cases were wrongly decided, the cases are now precedent of this Court. Thus, I cannot join his dissent. I concur in the Court’s decision to deny relief.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9758088. Public record. Not legal advice.