# Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · July 18, 2007 · 592 Pa. 664

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9757731

## Case

- **Full name:** STATION SQUARE GAMING L.P., Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. PITG Gaming, L.L.C., Intervenor; IOC Pittsburgh, Inc., Petitioner, v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, Respondent. PITG Gaming, L.L.C., Intervenor
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** July 18, 2007
- **Citations:** 592 Pa. 664; 927 A.2d 232; 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1445
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Baer
- **Judges:** Cappy, Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Fitzgerald
- **Cited by:** 37 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9757731

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that Board asserts claims were waived but “has not pointed this [C]ourt to anything reassuring us that [losing applicants] had a way in which to lodge such objections to the financial suitability inquiry conducted by the Board” with inspect to winning applicant

## Opinion text

Justice BAER,
concurring.
I agree with Mr. Justice Saylor’s thoughtful observations regarding the effect that the applicable “prudent man” stan *697 dard has on our review under the circumstances of this case. In all other respects, I join the Majority Opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9757731. Public record. Not legal advice.