# Harrell v. Tobriner

> District Court, District of Columbia · March 4, 1968 · 279 F. Supp. 22

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9756847

## Case

- **Full name:** Minnie HARRELL Et Al., Plaintiffs, Clay Mae LeGrant, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Walter N. TOBRINER Et Al., Defendants; Vera M. BARLEY Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Walter N. TOBRINER Et Al., Defendants; Gloria Jean BROWN Et Al., Plaintiffs, Clay Mae LeGrant, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Walter N. TOBRINER Et Al., Defendants
- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** March 4, 1968
- **Citations:** 279 F. Supp. 22
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bazelon
- **Judges:** Bazelon, Fahy, Holtzoff
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9756847

## Opinion text

BAZELON, Chief Judge
(concurring).
I concur in Judge FAHY’S opinion and would only emphasize that equal protection requires a statutory classification to be reasonably related to a “proper governmental objective,” Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954), and that to deter indigents from settling in the District of Columbia is not such an objective, Edwards v. People of State of California, 314 U.S. 160 , 62 S.Ct. 164 , 86 L.Ed. 119 (1941).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9756847. Public record. Not legal advice.
