# Broussard v. State

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · January 10, 2002 · 68 S.W.3d 197

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9755559

## Case

- **Full name:** Reginald v. BROUSSARD, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** January 10, 2002
- **Citations:** 68 S.W.3d 197; 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 250; 2001 WL 1691310
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Jennings
- **Judges:** Scott Brister
- **Cited by:** 27 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9755559

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that, without new trial motion to create record of trial counsel’s reasons for actions, appellate court must presume actions were product of overall strategic design and reasonable
- finding evidence insufficient to demonstrate counsel was ineffective for failing to file suppression motion based upon officers’ unannounced entry
- finding evidence insufficient to demonstrate counsel ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion based upon officers= unannounced entry

## Opinion text

*202 Justice JENNINGS,
concurring with the decision on en banc consideration. See id.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9755559. Public record. Not legal advice.