# Kennelty v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · November 14, 2007 · 594 Pa. 12

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9754110

## Case

- **Full name:** Kevin KENNELTY v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SCHWAN’S HOME SERVICE, INC.) Petition of Schwan’s Home Service, Inc.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** November 14, 2007
- **Citations:** 594 Pa. 12; 934 A.2d 692; 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2379
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Saylor
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9754110

## Opinion text

*13
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW this 14th day of November 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The order of the Commonwealth Court dated May 31, 2006, is reversed. The WCJ determined that the testimony of the employees of Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., was credible to the extent they testified that the frequency of occurrences of work-related incidents experienced by Petitioner was normal for their specific industry; the Commonwealth Court is not free to disturb this credibility determination based on competent evidence. See Daniels v. WCAB (Tristate Transp.), 574 Pa. 61 , 828 A.2d 1043, 1052 (2003) (holding that the WCJ is the ultimate finder of fact and the exclusive arbiter of credibility and evidentiary weight). See also RAG (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, L.P. v. WCAB (Hopton), 590 Pa. 413 , 912 A.2d 1278 (2007) (holding that the aggravation of a pre-existing psychic injury by a psychic stimulus is compensable pursuant to workers’ compensation laws only where credible evidence demonstrates that such injury stems from an abnormal working condition). Additionally, Employer’s Petition for Supersedeas is denied as moot.
Justice SAYLOR filed a Concurring Statement.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9754110. Public record. Not legal advice.